How twisted is god to create a world where life must feed on life?

Your god can do anything, right? Why didn’t he find a way for life to sustain itself without the need for violence? Such a world is more fitting to the idea of evolution by natural selection than to the idea of a kind god.

Click Here! to find out Christs prophecy for 2012

11 Responses to “How twisted is god to create a world where life must feed on life?”

  • Miss Cassie:

    You poor poor man I feel bad for you in the end. God did create a World without violence, It was MAN that ruined it. Back in the beginning of the World when he created it. AFTER Satan/Lucifer had made the tree in the center of the garden. It was Adam and Eve that chose to sin. Our world would’ve been perfect if they could just live with what they had. But no, thats what is happening to our World we can’t just be happy with what we have. We always need more. It is not God who has made the World twisted but it is of you, Man, who lusts for more, needs more, and does not obey his rules. He did have a way for life to sustain itself without violence. But he will not force himself on you, he lets you choose life or death. Satan wanted, no lusted to be better than God, so My savour sent him away. To Hell. I pray for you.

    And God can do anything. I know because he saved me and there is still hope for you.

  • M'thooz:

    That’s why stupid people who stupidly claim the evolution is compatible with gods are just stupid.

    Either that, or god is just stupid!

  • punch:

    Oh, didn’t you know? That’s all because of man. When he sinned it went out in the animal kingdom. Did you know T-Rex had big ferocious teeth for eating coconuts?

  • Fishpaste:

    Good point. My church seems to avoid that type of question when it comes up… But I know the idea of free will exists, so if we wanted to kill someone, we could. It’s all about thinking for yourself. And we’re violent, which brings us back to your question. Hmm… I don’t really know.

  • cleosgirl2345:

    I agree with you. It’s savage and unpleasant and we remove ourselves from the eyes looking at us in question and they go to slaughter. We buy meat in it’s styrofome, plastic rapped portions, no images of the savagery that may have brought it to us.

    I think maybe man has had so many changes in our existence in the last few hundred years that we forget the struggles to stay alive our forefathers suffered. Better yet go back to Midevil times. Paper? Clothes (like weaving it!)? Soap? Toilets and Toilet Paper, Shelter, Cars, News? We go to Home Depot, Office Depot, Macy’s and the Grocery store, and I don’t know about you but I feel I’m inconvenienced at fitting it all into my schedule. I talk on my cell phone, jet over to where-ever in my car, look up any fact I’m concerned with on the Internet … on and on. GPS, satellites, 100’s of channels, washing machines, dryers, central air/heat. Showers everyday, deodorant, sunblock, nails, power tools, Farmer’s Markets…good Lord, we are so removed from where we came from we have come forget how we get our food and the killing involved. At this point, you’re probably right. We could kill those legumes and get our protien. Our antiseptic life is so recent on the timeline of man it’s barely a blip. I don’t have any answers, I agree it’s not a pretty picture …the of killing animals. Very recently we’d have to hunt for food and be glad for whatever the rifle (what about before rifles?) was able to hit to feed our families. The fat would light our lamps, their hides would warm us, on and on….

    I want my chicken and my steak and my child needs the protein. A greater mind than mine will find the solution. Lets hope it doesn’t go the Soylent Green way. Sorry, that just came to mind. Silly.

    Good luck to you and your endeavors.

    I hope you are formulating an answer as you ask the question.

    Excuse any mispellings.

  • Ashton D:

    The flesh sustaining itself with other flesh is not twisted unless it harms the spirit. Eating a cow does not include violence against the spirit. Life requiring "destruction" is key to spirituality. Perhaps God chose to arrange things in a way that would require us to recognize in our daily lives that we cannot sustain ourselves without help from outside our own bodies. This corresponds to the way that humanity cannot overcome its own flaws without God’s plan of redemption.

  • Tomodachi senshi:

    He isn’t twisted. He just picks and chooses. And He understands that humans shouldn’t live on water alone. Would you >want< to live in a world where animals were given rights, like in India? Cows walk the streets, and a certain type of primate walks the streets. Sunlight doesn’t have a taste, nor does it have all the nutrients we would require. Evolution, though? We intelligent beings came from beings that swing in trees, and only have body language and weird noises that anyone could learn to understand? 24 pairs of chromosomes in an ape, and 23 in a human? Evolutionists say that one pair of chromosomes fused for us. Neanderthals? Or just an extinct breed of ape? Carbon dating might be wrong, you know. Evolution could be proved wrong if we found out that a more advanced creature existed too early. I wonder what time will tell. God is kind and softhearted. He did die for us. How did all this energy happen to form Earth, the galaxies, the universes? You can come up with all kinds of hypotheses, but it will always come down to where the energy came from, and how was it shaped, without anything there. Everything would take some form of energy, and how are we to explain where it came from? If you want to say that it didn’t have to be a God, what else would you call it? Multiple people would have bickered, and never would have got it done. In any type of mythology, where there were more than two people, there was fighting. So, I hope you have a better understanding now.

  • Liz .:

    We all have a sin nature in us, but all the sins we commit, have committed and ever will, have been payed for by the blood of Jesus on the cross. He died so that we might be forgiven, and if we willingly choose, and pray, we can have a personal relationship with him. Without "suffering" or "bad things" in the world, there would be no need for God to have died on the cross, forgive us of our sins, or to even have a beautiful, great, almighty Savior that can comfort you and heal you and restore your life, no matter what you have been through.

    Suffering, sin, and violence, are all things that happen(ed) as results of people’s choices, or doings. We have the power to chose what we are going to do, but its the power behind those choices that will determine the outcome. I could chose to curse someone off, but I want to strive to be a Godly, loving person, so i chose not to do so. If someone has thoughts of going and murdering someone, and they have no morals, standards or higher choices to live by, then how can that be stopped? I believe in Jesus Christ, and I know that every choice has an consequence, whether good or bad, but i know from the Bible, God’s spoken words within it, and my personal choices, that murder is a sin, its un-loving, un-fruitful, its even a ten-commandment! And i simply dont want to break the law either, but just think i’m talking about someone elses life here! "figuratively". I have the power to choose, and by God’s once perfect, physically lived example of how i should live, act and think, I want to strive and choose to be and as much of an example and witness of that as possible. We ALL have that same power to choose our actions, its what we know is Godly, loving, good, right, just, caring, and fruitful that will determine what we do do.

  • Corey W:

    God did not create violence satan tempted the first people into sinning
    then sin just spread from there

  • `Wawtur`:

    Science is tentative at best. Consensus is no measure of factuality. Even long-trusted scientific theories can be challenged by anomalies. As Thomas Kuhn and subsequent philosophers of science have pointed out, scientists typically work within paradigms, or accepted explanatory frameworks. Anomalies are surprises that don’t fit the paradigm. When too many anomalies accumulate, a scientific revolution may occur, and a new paradigm may take its place. If you compromise the Bible with the latest paradigm, your position could become a casualty of the next one. The Bible has outlasted a great many paradigms. Considering its Author, that’s no surprise.

Leave a Reply

Powered by Yahoo! Answers